Samsung's Galaxy Note 7 apology is appreciated, but transparency and details about what went wrong will go farther for the brand.
2016-11-09 08:37:49
alice
11
That transparency will do more to repair Samsung's brand hit than any apology will. Here's what questions I'd like answered:
How did the handoff between the players in the supply chain lead to the Galaxy Note 7 battery issue?
What processes will be changed?
How does Samsung's post mortem apply to the smartphone industry overall?
The actual cause of the battery issue and the role of hardware and software integration?
Where did Samsung controls and management decision making fall short and what's being done to fix those process shortfalls?
Add it up and the investigation into the device and its parts are important. The processes and learning for the rest of the industry will be just as important.
-
How Gaza’s plastic factories are betting on recycling[2016/11/03]
-
Colder weather means it's time for vehicle preparation[2016/10/11]
-
It’s Not Just Clean Air: Electric Cars Can Save the US Billions[2016/10/28]
-
Global Connector Industry[2016/10/29]
-
Video Microscopy Technique Reveals How Battery-Killing Dendrites Grow[2016/10/21]
-
Airline ban on Samsung Galaxy Note 7 widens as concern grows about fire risk[2016/10/17]
-
How to stop your smartphone battery from exploding[2016/09/30]
-
Mopie Powerstation Review: A Smartphone's Secret To All-Day Battery Life[2016/09/26]
-
A window into battery life for next-gen lithium cells[2016/10/19]
-
BLOG For want of a better battery: Bob McDonald[2016/10/15]
-
St. Jude Warns Defibrillator Patients About Battery Risks[2016/10/12]
-
Should you fear your phone battery?[2016/10/13]
-
AM Alert: Plastic bags’ environmental impact debated[2016/10/18]
-
Surface Pro 3 plagued by more battery problems[2016/09/23]
-
THE BATTERY TECHNOLOGY THAT COULD PUT AN END TO BATTERY FIRES[2016/10/25]